saviarora

Broadcaster, Columnist, Political Blogger, Author & Media Commentator

Previous Next
  • HOME
  • About
  • Podcasts
  • Posts by Year
    • 2004
    • 2005
    • 2006
    • 2007
    • 2008
    • 2009
    • 2010
    • 2011
    • 2012
    • 2013
  • Publications
    • Quotes
    • Novel
  • Media Appearances
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • Smooth Groovers
  • Sikhwithin
  • Apathy
  • cameronsregret2
  • Golden-temple
  • religions united
  • paramstyle
  • KhalsaAidimage1
  • life-of-pi-theisland
  • Nationwide Protests Over IR Changes
  • london 2012 - pic2
  • london-Dec-2012
  • romney-gets-wanded not shoe shined
  • PembrokeshireOutlook
  • Sportsrelief2012-3
  • IMG_1451
  • saviaroraonGMS14thAug
  • Dr Savi - June 2011
  • peoplepower
  • BAComplaint
  • BBCsikhstory
  • InterviewShot-April2010
  • Bhopal
  • homelessinSouthall
  • onedayswages

Category: Media Watch

2 Why Sorry Seems To Be The Hardest Word for Mr Cameron

  • February 21, 2013
  • drsavi
  • · 2013 · Ethics · Justice · Media Watch · Sikhs
cameronsregret2

cameronsregret

By quite co-incidence Venky Vembu has published a similar post. Even I was thinking of that Elton John classic for my title of this piece. Venky’s excellent article entitled: ‘shinde-to-cameron why sorry seems to be the hardest word‘ suggests:

A heartfelt “sorry”, it would appear, is just about the hardest word in the English lexicon for politicians to unburden themselves of.

This is in reference to David Cameron’s visit to India this week. He has visited the Golden Temple and just outside one of the four entrances is the famous park called Jallianwala Bagh. NB The Indianoil advert is quite inappropriate!
Jallianwala_Bagh_Entrance

On Sunday 13th April 1919 my Grandfather was one of thousands attending a public meeting. Luckily he survived but thousands didn’t as they were shot at by Brigadier-General Reginald E.H. Dyer. The background is that Dyer heard about the meeting of 15,000 to 20,000 people including women, children and the elderly at Jallianwala Bagh, Dyer went with fifty riflemen to a raised bank and ordered them to shoot at the crowd. Dyer continued the firing until the ammunition supply was almost exhausted. The crowd ran for cover but all they could find were deep wells. Their deaths were horrific, egged on by malice in the hearts of those who commanded.

On 13 March 1940, at Caxton Hall in London, Udham Singh, an Indian independence activist from Sunam who had witnessed the events in Amritsar and was himself wounded, shot and killed Michael O’Dwyer, the British Lieutenant-Governor of Punjab at the time of the massacre, who had approved Dyer’s action and was believed to be the main planner. (Dyer himself had died in 1927).

In years to come more would die at new country borders as the British divided up India.

Cameron acknowledgement of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre as a “deeply shameful event” fell short of a formal apology. Later he even justified why an apology would not work?!

Politics is littered with half and full apologies. However, I believe that it is never too late to express regret, portray genuine empathy and seek both truth and reconciliation. For example, in South Africa the Truth and Reconciliation tribunals was based on the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, No 34 of 1995 (pdf).

Interestingly, the Labour party under Gordon Brown issued an apology to Australians back in 2009/10.

Gordon Brown is to offer a formal apology to tens of thousands of British children forcibly sent to Commonwealth countries during the last century, many of whom faced abuse and a regime of unpaid labour rather than the better life they were promised.

On the outlook there appears to be a difference in approach that cannot be attributed to the severity of the deed. There are no degrees of measure to what constitutes enough damage to warrant regret, regardless of the perpetrator. Mr Cameron needs to realise that part of accepting the role of a leader in society or a political party, he is compelled to accept its legacy and heritage.

If I was cynical I would suggest that recent statements are made in the context of trading concessions. Everyone smiles yet behind the mask as there are millions of Dollars at stake for new agreements! Sky News suggested that the UK will ‘just have to join the queue’ as other state heads visit India to secure contracts.

We need to recognise that the UK has a rich connection with India. The word ‘rich’ is stronger than most people realise. For example, through spices, The East India Company, railways, buildings, bridges, hill stations, army connections, maharaja politics, births, land line/border distortions and diamond acquisitions (!) The legacy and record of the British Commonwealth and other colonialists is nothing to be proud of. What has been left behind by many of these powers is a tangled infrastructure that constrains or constricts progression. This is further perpetuated by political stooges and a fear to change for the better. India may be succeeding in answering your call centre queries but can it solve its problems in society given its prehistoric police systems, cast hangups and inequality – the latter also brought out in recent crimes against women.

India needs to be bolder in asking the UK why it has fallen short of a full apology. It deserves more than token poses. Sorry is probably the hardest word because it is an admittance of the British intent to damage and leave alone, i.e: as true revelations are incomplete and hidden.

Image below, The Jallianwala Bagh memorial
Massacre_memorial_in_Amritsar

0 Take me out Saturday 5th Jan 2013 Review – Param Style

  • January 9, 2013
  • drsavi
  • · 2013 · Media Watch · Political comment · Sikh Media · Sikhs
paramstyle

It has been one of those weekends where my Facebook newsfeed has just lite up with a wide range of views every since Param Singh went on the Take me Out dating show.

Take Me Out is a dating show presented by Paddy McGuinness. Paddy plays matchmaker to 30 single women all of which are hoping to meet the man of their dreams. Different single men have to try and impress the women as they watch/hear from a prospective male. NB The girls are assembled in a horizonal line/panel stood at podiums with a two option light-up code: Red = reject and White = ‘I’m interested’ and I’m impressed with what I’ve seen/heard. If there are any women left with their lights on at the end of the game the men can then choose which one of them to go out on a date with. Confused? I certainly was by Param’s decision to go on.

The rules, a full list can be found here: For example, the show insists that:

Rule 8: ‘You must be single and aged eighteen or over at the time of the application. You will be asked to provide the Producer with valid and current photographic ID and other documentation in order to substantiate your age (i.e. birth certificate, driving licence and/or valid passport). Rule 9. You must have the right to live and work in the UK and hold a valid passport.’

OK, so these rules suggest you must be an adult, rather than an adult with sound mind! Or, maybe the show is just an arena or facilitator of just good old fashioned fun. It is easy to cringe as right at the beginning of the show 30 girls journey to their podiums two-by-two, holding hands and dancing along a long runaway. Its quite simply a parade of silliness!

On a serious note, I’ve met Param a number of times. He is a genuine guy with a heart of gold and a unique sense of style. His brothers are great too, having developed a set of publications that are inspirational & deeply thoughtful from a spiritual perspective.

Essentially the Param’s result was what is known in the game as a ‘blackout’ -  a strange sense of double meaning, i.e: leaving wth no acceptance for a date. Was Param motives to go on the show in search of a good time and the ultimate prize holiday in Fernandos or was it self-promotion? One thing is for sure, he was quick witted and gave as good as he got. During a Q&A in the early stages of selection (some girls had left their lights on), one girl suggested that she didn’t need a handbag when going out as she could store items in Param’s turban. Param responded with, there is more space up here! Again, another double meaning, i.e: There is more brains up here than you my dear!

However, as I mentioned at the start of this post, my personal Facebook timeline saw a mix of emotion. Some people were clearly alarmed and some took it in their stride as a bit of old fashioned jolliness. Unfortunately, my view is that there is already too much jolliness with Sikhs being mocked in Bollywood. At a couple of interesting media outlet’s :Nihal’s show on BBC Network Asia (whatever that means) and the excellent Langar hall (http://thelangarhall.com/general/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-dating-while-sikh/), the debate continues. I also saw an excellent Tweet from Naujawani.com on 8th Jan:

‘It might lack subtlety, but makes up for it with a powerful message: wearing a turban/dastaar comes with responsibility http://bit.ly/U09jN4‘.

Referring to the excellent film by Satwant Singh, an award winner at last years Sikhnet Film festival and also shown during the Mr Singh International event last month! Was that a contradiction?

The issues range from fashion to appropriateness. Yes, it is good to be fashion conscious, if you like that sort of thing (I do and I try! Some may remember my leather trousers and that was pre-Terminator days!). However, does loving fashion show a strange sense of being vain or just wanting to look and feel good. Who are we dressing for anyway? Ourselves, or to attract others. We all know that a large element is the latter as we’re all human. The show raised deeper questions on what women truly desire. The truth is that Sikhs need to behave in public in a respectful way, it is what our crowns are presenting in once sense, i.e: A royalty, heritage and empowered to help others. I believe it is in our psyche.

I’ve been fortunate to have appeared on some main stream TV and recently it has been more of what I call through an ethnic channel. It is not easy. Scripting and control are essential to ensure content of substance that is memorable. On a dating or commercial show you are at the mercy of the editors and producers. They want contention, talk-active and mischievous content. We need to consider if we as Sikhs should rise to their bait.?

The problem is that Sikhs are not part of the mainstream. Newsnight tends to ‘wheels out’ its favourites. TV Researchers use people they can trust and I always cite Jon Snow of Channel 4 news. At a conference on media (including social), he said he had been advised to blog and that you have to look at who the editors are, their background et al. i.e: paraphrasing: We may have brown faces in the front reading the news but the controllers are from a particular part of the community. You can also say that about today’s Tory party with lots of their friends from Eton!
In addition, we see no new presenters emerging. It is the same old bumbling English men/women presenting documentaries, walks & programmes. We need more presenters that reflect society around us. Sikhs have been in the western world since the early 1900s and are hopefully here to stay. Get used to it people!

Today, in a step to create media we’ve lost cite of needing to be part of the media. Unfortunate mistaken identity episodes involving Sikhs is partly down to a lack of education about who we are and the need for many of stories about our self-less nature. I’ll never forget back in 2010, during the Golden Temple Exhibition at the University of London School of Oriental and Asian Studies (SOAS). During a City Sikhs special viewing with I believe Param present together with Gurka Singh from the US, a young lady suggested during a Q&A segment, paraphrasing, ‘Surely cases of mistaken identity would be less if Sikhs were seen to be the humanitarians that they are’. She was right on the mark with that comment. Khalsa Aid and other charities never seem to get a big mention. Therefore, we all have a part to play to make sure their work is seen and heard. This alone would be a strong message to every community about who we are.

Let us return to the main theme of this post. Should a Sikh consider going on this type of dating time show. Firstly, if it is for awareness, then there are definitely better ways of achieving that. If it was for good old fun, is that the same reason why the rest of the participants were there?

Watch below and decide for yourself but I think you may conclude that in hindsight it probably sounded like good idea at the time but it has morphed into strange avenues, i.e: . It has raised a dark debate in terms of looking at ourselves, seeing how people view each other from a first impression perspective and a clue to consider how we are developing as an integrated society rather than sleepwalking into one that is assimilated. If the latter happens then this would mean we have lost ourselves!

4 Citizen Khan Sitcom Review

  • September 6, 2012
  • drsavi
  • · 2012 · BBC · Interfaith · Media Watch · Multiculturalism

Over the last few nights I’ve been watching a new sitcom TV series commissioned by the BBC called Citizen Khan. It features a Pakistani family based in Birmingham. The original character’s inception was based in Leicester via shorts from a separate series called Bellamy’s people (A TV version of the Radio 4 phone-in satire show Down The Line. ‘Clueless DJ Gary Bellamy is let out of the studio to meet people face-to-face’). Khan is played by the same actor, Adil Ray. Adil’s a writer, DJ and co-producer of the show. Interestingly, the character wore the same outfit – A 70s style brown chequered suit with a half-sleeved jumper as a waist coat and a Karakul. .For Bellamy’s shorts the character was positioned as a ‘community leader’ combining ‘off the cuff, in street’ public discussions and armchair based rhetoric advice for the public and politicians.

For Mr Khan’s current incarnation, or should we say ‘Citizen Khan’, he returns as a budding business & community leader. On first watch his opinions are timewarped with canned laughter to ease the cringes! Its true to say that there are some very funny universal themes exploited at the characters expense. For example, husband-wife and mother-in-law relationships with an inflated / exaggerated egos thrown, ‘into the mix’.

Humour is really difficult to write and its easy for writers to choose the lowest form of wit. With regard to Citizen Khan although it often invokes a laugh-out-loud reaction based on ridiculous stereotypes, at times its humour borders on risky themes. However, most appear harmless enough compared to other attempts to engage a cross-cultural audience (my view). For example, the film 4 Lions.
Maybe there is a Lenny Bruce thing going on, a suggested negative racism to challenge pre-conceptions ?

There are some questions to ask. Firstly, without a balanced schedule, such programmes will suffer more reaction (bad) & complaints. Either not enough thought and talent centred on mainstream themes is emerging or again just like news reporting editorial bias exists in what makes it to prime time. In terms of can communities laugh at themselves even if they do not represent a positive view of their society? The answer is likely to be no as British comedy appears to focus on slapstick and polarised constructs. US sitcoms on the other hand create loveable characters that show an integrated life-style. The hugely popular My wife and kids (US based) sitcom focused more on relationships. That is not to say that US sitcoms don’t steer away from say Jewish humour or ridiculous situations.

In summary, my point is that although Citizen Khan offers some great laughs, we need more variety shows with characters representing our society in general. Playing on a stereotype may work in a skit but creating loveable characters requires a story-line that people can identify and reflect on.

NB We’re only 2 episodes in and I’m already wondering who will be offended more, the stereotyped lifetyle, Birmingham, religious communities or gingers!? Saying that, its really just for laughs and a situation not real life !

BTW – A very clever tactic used in hugely successful comedies of the past is to use an invisible character, for example Maris (Frazier), Cliff’s mother (Cheers). In this sitcoms case, its Mr Khan’s rival: Mr Malik.

0 Oak Creek Shootings – The role of media to help us all

  • August 9, 2012
  • drsavi
  • · 2012 · BBC · Interfaith · Justice · Media · Media Watch · Political comment


It has been a few days now of what could be described as limited media coverage, from a UK perspective of the Oak Creek Shooting that resulted in 7 deaths by a shooter that entered a place of worship.

On Monday night, traditionally peak news viewing time the BBC presented less than 20seconds of coverage before launching into the latest round-up of Olympic GB wins. NB earlier in the day its website did feature some online inches.

Globally the feeling in the Sikh community is visibly one of shock and dismay. The killing of 7 people inside a place of worship by a ex army solider adds to the continuing debate of why guns are so widely available.

I’ve watched and monitored from the sidelines, viewing Facebook messages of support and prayer for those who have been affected. I’ve tuned into twitterfeeds that have linked to CNN and videos of people trying to communicate who Sikhs are. Valerie Kaur’s piece provided a retrospective on how her grandfather had emigrated to the US over a century ago – It is an inspiring piece. I also read a post by Naujawani suggesting that the reason for the low media pick-up on the story is due to the lack of integration in today’s society. My reaction is that it takes two to tango and that it is not through lack of trying, although I agree that more could be done to subtly communicate the values that we share.

I too share the dismay of the families who one day went to seek a meditative environment but were left with a nightmare that will never truly fade. They will continue to find answers as to why it happened and unfortunately relive the seconds, minutes and hours of each death. This morning I saw some amazing Twitpics of the NYC candlelight vigil held on Wednesday night, showing we can unite to share in grief but also offer hope.We pray for them, their spirit will live on.

Why has there been poor reporting about this tragedy?
I really want to understand why the press coverage has been so poor. Sure, in the US we’ve seen CNN cover the issue but correct me if I’m wrong, its not made it to a global news platform. I really don’t want to go down the path of suggesting that its a race thing or even that one life is considered more important than others. I hark back to a 45 minute presentation by veteran anchor man, Jon Snow of Channel 4 news. He suggested that its not about the background of the person presenting the news but its about who gives the go ahead for featured editorials. I think we all know what is the background of the latter club is.

My conclusion is that it is down to pure ignorance nothing more. Not just about who Sikhs are but the wider issue of gun control/ownership, identifying potential threats, creating a more caring society and the potential to  generate mutual respect through creative and positive media content.

A call for Media take-over
Positive Media is the easiest weapon against perpetrators of hate driven individuals and groups.
Although social media allows us to giggle at each other, we need to stop being passive and become a tidal wave or flood of information. As I’ve said in the past and continue to repeat:

Unless we create media of our own, somebody else will tell our story.

The truth will prevail.
We can also all have access to a free blog that life-streams our thoughts and for those who  don’t want to be tracked online, they can contribute to local newsletters and press. Its all about communicating the good in all, for example: art, literature, history, heritage, values, global contribution and our values in defending the defenseless.

I’ve set up a citizen journalist site: http://sikhwithin.crowdmap.com – Here, anyone in the world can send in a story. We need to challenge the current media obsession with trival stories and get them to rely on people bringing the true issues to bare. The 21st century has given us tools to help us communicate, mobilize and take action.

Whatever method, we all have a part to play to tell the world that there are good people out there and there are people in need of help before they become evil. Humanitarian stories will create a positive and respective image for all.

0 Word of the Year 2010

  • December 22, 2010
  • drsavi
  • · 2010 · Corporate Responsibility · Media Watch

Merriam-Webster  announced that “austerity” saw more than 250,000 searches on the dictionary’s free online tool. This was probably due to greater coverage of the international debt crisis. Therefore, it was announced by the company as Word of the Year for 2010. Runners-up also included “pragmatic,” “moratorium,” “socialism,” and “bigot”. For example, the latter possibly motivated from the public use by former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown! see: http://www.saviarora.com/gordon-brown-bigot-comment/

Austerity, is a 14th century noun defined as “the quality or state of being austere” and “enforced or extreme economy,”

Does this mean that people look behind the meaning of words? Or, could it be that the public wish to verify their use, checking-up on those who potentially should know better? I will always remember the words from the Reverend Jesse Jackson when I interviewed him a few years ago (see http://www.saviarora.com/rev-jesse-jackson-and-the-rainbow-push-coalition/). He suggested (paraphrasing)  that it is interesting some banks were quick to lend. However, now that there is an issue, they need to show both Corporate Responsibility and justice.

Now is the time for creative solutions to ensure that people, all who are hardworking can manage their existence and dreams.

Although nations in 2010 have focused on Austerity measures, have they:

  • Identified their own areas of waste,
  • Found potential investment in renewal strategies,
  • Shown courage to support small businesses,
  • Revisited private firms/contracts and associated procurement strategies
  • Limited bankers bonuses (see: http://www.saviarora.com/bankers-bonuses-do-they-deserve-it/) and
  • Started to seriously invest in youth based projects to give them hope rather than fueling their debt and despair?

I hope 2011 will be a year of creative renewal rather than a year of deepening crisis.

Page 1 of 51 2 3 … 5 »

My Tweets

  • “How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world.” ― Anne Frank 1 day ago
  • RT @The_Angry_Nurse: Two nutters with knives don't represent two billion Muslims, and one EDL crowd without brains does not represent seven… 1 day ago
  • Clouds by Zach Sobiech youtube.com/watch?v=sDC97j… via @youtube 1 day ago
  • RT @guardian: Photo coverage of the #Oklahoma tornado that has torn through the suburb of #Moore gu.com/p/3gxzy/tw 1 day ago
  • RT @Sikhchic: No Country For Women: India Today dlvr.it/3Pk8QP 1 day ago
  • Kate & Pippa Bad Teeth celebrating comedy week on YouTybe: youtube.com/watch?v=_2ILQL… 2 days ago
  • RT @yespunjab: Indian girl invents revolutionary device : Can charge phone in 20 seconds ow.ly/ldair ow.ly/i/29SfO 3 days ago
  • Paying for the chance to develop Google Glass !? youtu.be/M-OXOgbzBGE 4 days ago
  • Is Google right to charge so much for its first 8000 youtu.be/M-OXOgbzBGE via @youtube 4 days ago
  • What if we had Google Glass today? youtu.be/S80mE3kQTJ0 4 days ago
  • Ugh! From my friend Baljit! vine.co/v/b9Wgqe7ePhB 4 days ago
  • Greeting the annual East Lindon ride - well done all vine.co/v/b9W6T2HOHL7 4 days ago
  • RT @SikhNet: Balpreet Kaur and the power of kindness | ow.ly/l9D1d 6 days ago
  • RT @preetybhachu: How is #eurovision trending when a little girl's death isn't? #justice4gurkiren 1 week ago
  • Hey, Baby! (Original Upload) by Komikero, suggests that we just smile! youtube.com/watch?v=bhuYIr… 1 week ago

Recent Posts

  • Breaking out of Apathy
  • Why Sorry Seems To Be The Hardest Word for Mr Cameron
  • National Geographic Traveller writing competition 2013 – my entry!
  • Religions and NGOs must unite to eradicate poverty
  • Take me out Saturday 5th Jan 2013 Review – Param Style

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 719 other followers

Theme: Customized Soundcheck by Luke McDonald. Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 719 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com